Warning! You may see nude pics here.
Hi all, this is my first follow along, I will go straight to it to keep it simple, if there are stuff I left out, do let me know!
Any feedback will be welcome.
Source: Juicyads (RON blacklist mode)
Cost model: CPC
Device: Mob
Banner size: 300x100
Geo: FR (estimated volume for 300x100 is estimated 11,242,127)
Bid price: 0.011 CPC
Daily budget: $22
11 Banners:
4 Landings:
3 offers: (Payout $1.60, $2.10, $2.75)
Other Settings:
Sextechnology: Enabled
Auto-blocking: Disabled
Source Soothing: 200 clicks
Alexa Ranking: Doesnât matter
Do you think if this campaign has chance to work? I am about to submit it for approval now.
Let me know if you need me to translate some of the text. I do not understand french myself, but i could google translate for you if required.
Is this the first campaign you're running?
Tbh RON traffic is tough for beginners as it's tough to optimize if you're not experienced and know what to look for.
Banners and landers look fine.
I think with such a low daily budget though RON traffic is not ideal since you'll need to spend a lot of money to get data.
If you run RON you'll literally get traffic from hundreds (thousands?) of spots, and it will be tough to decipher the data since none of it will be statistically significant.
The banners and LPs are standard stuff... some can work, the test will show you. A lot will depend on the offers too.
I agree with jabong though, RON isn't the best to start with.
I didnt use juicyads for a while, but there used to be an option to buy from specific sites, is it still available? That might be a better option for now.
When I was starting out, I was doing this on juicy... finding the small but quality websites and creating campaigns for each of them, I had several stable campaigns there, each making a couple $ daily.
Yes matuloo, the direct buy option is still available. In fact, i have tried the direct buy and it was quite limiting for testing as i could only test one creative at a time. But how did you determine that a website was quality before buying it? Was it the alexa rank? Any idea how can i find hidden gems without RON since it is not recommended? I also haven't really heard of many people using juicy recently, do you know the reason why?
Landers look good. I reckon we can offer you a better pay out.
PM.
Yep. We'll offer you 75% comm.
New landers will be ready this weekend.
I don't see it that way, get your point, but it was just an offer for him to accept or reject.
To again quote yourself, 'what I don't get' is why you're jumping on it.
Not cool...
I know that old threads on this site say that Juicy Ads is a "low competition" site, but the fact is most "desirable" spot buys are likely already taken.
For example I'd be surprised if you could find a decent spot that had a majority French traffic and wasn't already bought up for months.
Most likely you'd have a spot that had French traffic and a lot of other geos you'd have to set up separate funnels for, and who knows if you could make money dealing with all those other geos at the same time.
Then of course there is the quality issue which is hit or miss there.
I think a better route if you want to stay on Juicy ads is to start a whitelist campaign and go down their list of larger sites and just target maybe 10-20 spots you think may have potential and then go from there to see if there are any winners.
That would definitely be a better choice than starting a RON campaign.
Thanks all for the feedback!
Rugster im plan to focus this before moving on as twinaxe suggested.
So I sorted the sites with highest volume of FR to see if i could find some to whitelist. And this is one of the top few that are available.
Really low! The volume is too low on each individual placements only, less than a 100 clicks a day for FR for this spot and it one of the top ones.
What i forgot to think about previously, was that out of the 11m impressions, only about 11k will be the clicks itself and so when split out between all the sites, its really small volume.
And those spots with more volumes are sold out as jabong mentioned.
Yes jabong, the older threads suggested juicy alot, but i also saw that it was stated as one of the sources to test in the âHow to run Adultâ by matuloo recently. And i was rejected by exoclick, so i thought this was the next best alternative to run something similar to exoclick.
Talking about exoclick, i applied 3 different times and they rejected all of them. They must be really hate me.
I feel that now that i see the situation here, i should just go to the main ones, instead of wasting more time testing on these smaller sites. Also in fact i decided to try banners to improve my quality on leads, So if these smaller sites gives lower quality lead, i will not like to work with it. Would you say banner leads are worse on these sites, as compared to pops or push ?
I was wondering when matuloo you say about bots, will bots actually fill in their email to give me a lead? i will definitely use you pointers on how to select a site, thanks alot!
I'm not saying that Juicy Ads is not a good traffic source, just that it's not as easy to work with as it was a while ago.
Also as far as Exoclick, what country are you from? This has a lot to do with rejections from my understanding.
Exoclick is definitely a place you need to get into though if you're serious about adult just due to the sheer volume of inventory they have.
You should definitely try to figure out why you're getting rejected from there.
I think you are right, but if the problem was my geo, do you know if there anything i can do about it? I have emailed exoclick many times, but they do not provide any reason to the rejection.
For that particular spot i found, it seem like too low volume, 100 clicks a day might only get 1 or no conversions. I cannot really find any Individual spots that i could work with at least some decent volume on juicy, at least for the FR geo, most of the volume are added by many small sites. Will test out ero and other networks.
It looks like the bot is pretty much like human now! I will set the language targetings, but for my tracker, bot filters rules have to be manually added. I saw that some IPs could be blocked, but im not sure what is a good rule to block an IP or suspicious traffic. Im also not able to detect a VPN.

i didnt hear before of that SSM method. For exoclick, I requested for a reason and solution to move forward with them, but they always give the same reply that their checks cannot be disclosed to me. I was at their booth when i was at the awa recently. Spoke to one of them, and said would help me to check my account and got their email. After went home, sent email right after conference, and another one about a month later, with no response. Maybe i got the wrong email, or chose the wrong person to work with. The main helpdesk was responsive but not giving me any solutions. I read here that some people encountered issues with them as well, and email could solve it, but it wasn't in my case. I will try again with this angle "Did you offer them to provide info about other sources you work with or something like this?".

Before i start with the update on FR dating, would hope your advice on something, as im still new to adult traffic.
As i mentioned previously, i had tried out TJ traffic before this. I had already stopped traffic, but i just received some bad news from my AM.
From the feedback, the leads were coming from âproxyâ and âsuspicious hosting providerâ
I have set a total of 658 leads. And 625 leads was from TJ. Keep in mind that, i have always used language targeting, setting it to the native language. Now i checked my tracker, all traffic received was in the native language.
I canât figure out what went wrong.
As you mentioned VPN/proxys are common when people are browsing tubes, how can I even prevent those from signing up to my offer?
So what happened was this:
I was running two different offers, same network. I have tried to check on quality when it was about 100-200 leads.
And then..
I get the boot for one offer, and i cannot blacklist any subids, not even that..
Ok, and then i continued running the other offer.
For the second offer, I was not kicked out, but i just stopped running traffic as it was not making much.
So i tried to checked again at about 300-400 leads for the second offer. I do not get any feedback from the advertiser, even though i passed back subids. I asked if there was anything to blacklist,.. nothing. So without that i feel like im blindly sending leads, since i couldnât know which subids did well for the advertiser, since it may do well for me but not for him. What could i have done in this case? It was usually mentioned to me, no news means good news, just continue running the shit. The suspicious leads was for both offers.
What do you pass back as subid, just traffic source? Or what do you recommend passing back as other subids ?
Do you think its possible that advertiser wants to know the traffic source and decides to get the info with this method?
Now there is no choice, but for me to provide the traffic source, if not i might not be paid.
Twinaxe, i did a search online but couldnât find the original post for SSM.
It seems to be automatically filling emails, and have to do with torrents. But how does that actually work?
Have you tried that SSM system before? As its no longer available now.
Could it be that people are using SSM and giving me fake leads here?
Could someone also please check my banners in my first post, how many angles am i running here? As i do not want to have an overlap in testing here.
I would not think itâs a proper A/B test. Since there are so many variations in the banners. I couldnât tell what was wrong.
How can i save on testing cost for banners and properly do a A/B test? What are some of the ways you start with testing new banners?
So if i change an image from a rotating gallery to a cartoon, is that considered as another angle? Or when leave the same image, and and change the text / headline, is that another angle? Or is it
Same for landing pages, am I actually testing the different landing classes? Since the questions are rather similar in the landing. Could it all be classified under one same category of landings ( Am i actually testing the same thing 3 times? )
Let me know if other details i left out .Really confused now, wish any help on this.
Bruh this is like the most incoherent post. Let me try to answer some of these lol.
1. You can't really prevent people using VPNs proxies to sign up for your offer, it is what it is. (at least that I know of)
2. I only pass traffic source subids. They dont need more than that.
3. If advertiser asks you for the traffic source, don't tell them. It's not their business. You should still get paid for leads regardless without revealing your traffic source (granted you didn't do anything shady).
4. I would say most of those banners are different angles (though a couple have the same text). Even if its the same "angle", the different designs of the banners are worth testing out if you find something promising.
5. Changing from a rotating gallery to a cartoon is not an angle change.
6. Yes changing text/headline to something different is usually an angle change granted the text means different things.
7. Even if you are using a "questions" lander, the design from one to another can make an impact.
Overall if the advertiser claims fraud and pauses you, just move on to the next offer. Im assuming you are going through an affiliate network and not working with a direct advertiser so I dont think payment should be an issue if you didnt do anything shady.
OP are they threatening non-payment for your leads?
There's a difference between an advertiser complaining about quality and them refusing to pay you.
Were these leads sent in a short time frame or was it spread out over a longer period?
If you are running for weeks and now the advertiser wants to claw back leads from like a month ago thats a different situation than say a large burst of leads over a 2-3 day period.
This was in his post, that's why I assumed he might be facing non-payment issues.

Thank you! Really appreciated on all your help on answering my stupid questions.
My traffic was said to be fraud. And yes i might not get paid.
Its not a quality issue.
I just checked my tracker and my leads was sent in pulses over the span of about a month..
| reports-day | reports-conversion |
| 2020-03-10 | 1 |
| 2020-03-09 | 9 |
| 2020-03-08 | 7 |
| 2020-03-07 | 1 |
| 2020-03-04 | 0 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2 |
| 2020-03-02 | 0 |
| 2020-03-01 | 19 |
| 2020-02-29 | 45 |
| 2020-02-28 | 57 |
| 2020-02-27 | 43 |
| 2020-02-26 | 46 |
| 2020-02-25 | 41 |
| 2020-02-24 | 19 |
| 2020-02-23 | 0 |
| 2020-02-22 | 0 |
| 2020-02-21 | 0 |
| 2020-02-20 | 0 |
| 2020-02-19 | 6 |
| 2020-02-18 | 27 |
| 2020-02-17 | 20 |
| 2020-02-16 | 34 |
| 2020-02-15 | 25 |
| 2020-02-14 | 40 |
| 2020-02-13 | 54 |
| 2020-02-12 | 52 |
| 2020-02-11 | 47 |
| 2020-02-10 | 49 |
| 2020-02-09 | 1 |
I have run into the "fraud report" issue 2-3 times over the past few years. Same thing interestingly enough it came from TJ sites.
I explained to the network that I have no control over who signs up for the offer. I have a fairly long history with the network ($xxx,xxx in revenue) so each time I got paid and was just asked to pause that traffic source.
I guess in your case if they want the traffic source details just send them your records. It's not like the offer is working out anyway so I would just try to get paid and move on to the next offer.
But the "fraud report" does happen from time to time even if you're 100% legit, it's just part of the game.
Yup, show them all the data and emphasize the fact that it comes from TJ which is as legit as it gets and they know it for sure. If they refuse payout in full, at least try to settle for a partial payment for the non-fraudulent leads.
Another thing you should try is to get a partial refund from TJ, if you can show them proof that the leads from their traffic were marked as fraudulent, you might get some compensation from them... it's a possibility, not granted, but worth a try.
Thank you!
Jabong, since you ran into the same problem, I have thought about the reason, not sure if this make sense. There are many countries that porn is blocked or has strict censorship. Take for example, North Korea. Maybe some people there wants to watch some adult stuff or maybe read some news, and they would use a VPN. And where which country would they choose. I think highly likely they would choose korea. So if i am running ads on Korea traffic, and even if i choose target language KR, i am likely to get many VPN users that understands the native language. They would gladly sign up my leads, and cause me issues.
Another thing is that, maybe common countries like US might be selected as a VPN location to browse since nothing is censored over there. And also. for countries that have internet censorship for those adult sites, there seems to be no point running ads there, since traffic is blocked, it is likely to be almost 100% VPN. But i just guessing, not sure if its true.
Matuloo, is there a difference between Fraud leads and VPN leads? But if its VPN traffic would it be TJ fault ? Since there is no targeting option in TJ that says that TJ will not give me VPN traffic. I have seen some traffic sources that could block VPN traffic, and i didnt know if there is such a thing in adult traffic . As I am thinking there should be a natural amount of VPN traffic that is on adult sites, which TJ has no control over.
I have given the traffic source info to them but removed some unnesssary info, still waiting for the results.
I've talked to TJ before about the VPN issue when I ran into the "fraud report" problem, and they basically said there's nothing they can do and they can't/won't filter it. This was like a year ago, I dont know if things have changed since.
That being said in your case we are talking about an extremely high percentage of leads which seems very unlikely.
Im guessing its partially an issue with your network/advertiser. I think sometimes if the leads don't back out sometimes the advertiser tries to pull some shady stuff, especially if it's a new affiliate.
I was always able to get paid because the network I had this problem with knew I was a legit affiliate and basically told the advertiser to pay up. I don't know if this is the situation in your case, but it could be.
I've run FR on TJ and have not had this problem. VPN fraud is definitely not going to be at like 50% on a TJ spot in my opinion.
Thanks for sharing about the experience.
I will check again with TJ.
But is there any GEO that you recommend I stay out of, in case there is too much VPN traffic. Or would you say that the percentage of VPN traffic is about the same in all GEOs?
You mentioned that âadvertiser tries to pull some shady stuff, especially if it's a new affiliateâ,
But how would the advertiser know im a new affiliate or not? Since i thought my affiliate status would be only kept with the affiliate network.
In the meanwhile, i was running the FR dating over few days.
As it was recommended for me to do a whitelist, I have chosen a spot and then just run on there with a CPM campaign.
Below are some of the data from the testing i have done.
I have filtered banners to show only those with conversions. (sorted by impressions high to low)
Banner stats:
Landing stats:
Offer stats:
Questions:
Am i supposed to be able to spot something interesting here? I probably tested too many as i got too excited. But is there some banners or landings or offers that i could select and run to be profitable, just from this data. Or is my bid price too high for it to work for my current offers ?
Im doing this report in excel as i have no choice, all impressions cost is not passed back to the tracker correctly. I had to do a excel each time i wanna analyse anything.
Is there a better way to do the tracking of impressions efficiently to save time? As making the excel takes time and it is difficult for me to analyse the realtime data.
Even if i manually update the cost daily for a campaign in tracker, when i drilldown the report, the cost will not be right for some variables. Since in the tracker they would usually split the cost by the views. So if i updated the cost in the tracker to be $XX, and for a CPM campaign, since the views that click into each banners is different. The tracker will allocate more cost to the banners with more views, and that is not accurate for a CPM campaign. Since a higher clicks would mean the average CPC is lower. Is there any way i can do it correctly?
*All the costs in the screenshots above should be correct as i already made the edits.
Please let me know if there is something else i missed out here. Im very confused on what is the next step to this.
As far as your questions about VPNs, if you're on TJ this is not a common issue. I'm probably already approaching 7-figures in spend there and it's been pretty rare and I've run pretty much all major geos.
I really think it's probably that specific advertiser, just pick a new offer and move on.
And yes advertisers know who you are even if you go through an affiliate network as you will have a unique affiliate ID that the network passes on. So they may not know your personal details, but they will know you as Affiliate 1005 or something.
As far as impressions, I don't track those. There is not really an accurate way to track impressions, I just track my cost, revenue, and cpc.
Your tracker will always be different than your traffic source, and whats in your tracker will be different than your affiliate network stats. At the end of the day you just have to track that these numbers are not too far off from each other.
There are definitely GEOs with higher VPN percentages, for example DE and NL are like this... but that doesn't mean that its not possible to run in those. There are DBs out there that have VPN data and you can utilize those DBs to block VPNs and other unwanted traffic types. Not all trackers are able to utilize those DBs though.
But I think jabong has a point here, I also spent a lot of $$$ with TJ and the fraud problems were very scarce, so it's likely a problem with the advertiser. They might be too strict or their backend monetization is not so effective so they might be looking to scrub some leads.
