Home > Technical & Creative Skills > Programming, Servers & Scripts

Best Server Setup 2019? (9)


01-05-2019 01:04 PM #1 eurosen (AMC Alumnus)
Best Server Setup 2019?

What do people feel is the best CDN / Hosting combo in 2019?

I am currently running on Amazon (S3,Cloudfront,Route53) but I find it quite slow.

Any suggestions for better setups?


01-05-2019 05:58 PM #2 kintura (Member)

Curious if you're using Alias records between Route53 > Cloudfront/S3? It can eliminate a pretty severe CNAME delay.


01-05-2019 07:10 PM #3 eurosen (AMC Alumnus)

Not sure what those are?

I am using the 4 Amazon nameservers.


01-06-2019 12:08 AM #4 thedudeabides (Moderator)

Answered that a bit your last post:

https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...rlwide-traffic

What's the goal and your requirements? Are you doing pops? Redirects? CPC based Ad traffic? Cloaking? Need more info to recommend a solution.

There's definitely a point of diminishing returns under a certain load speed that you should already be approaching by using a CDN solution for most things.


01-06-2019 06:19 AM #5 eurosen (AMC Alumnus)

This is for a different purpose then my last thread.

I will be hosting simple html landing pages to be used with native, push and pops.


01-06-2019 11:59 PM #6 vortex (Senior Moderator)

First of all - do you know which service is causing the delay?

The redirection chain usually goes like this:

Tracker domain DNS -> Tracker redirection to lander -> Lander domain DNS -> CDN

S3 can't be the culprit - because the pages are being served from Cloudfront.

I would start by checking DNS speed of your tracker domain and lander domain:

https://www.ultratools.com/tools/dnsHostingSpeed

Tracker redirection speed would be tricky to test - perhaps people that are more knowledgeable than I am at this tech stuff (which many people are) may have a better solution, but I would suggest to subscribe to a managed cloud tracker (not self-hosted) for a month just to run some benchmark stats to make sure your current tracker settings are good. It may sound like a ton of hassle, but slow redirection speed can limit the performance of all future campaigns you run on that tracker.

Then of course you can switch to a faster DNS service and/or a faster CDN service, but I doubt either would help decrease speed by a significant amount - assuming the stats on these sites are correct:

https://www.dnsperf.com

https://www.cdnperf.com/

According to these sites, the fastest services will only gain you another <100ms in total over the ones you're currently using. It may or may not be worth it to switch - I have no idea whether the minute increase would result in an increase in conversion rates because I've never done a comparison.

Overall speaking though, optimizing lander code and images is the most crucial, but with your level of experience, you must be a pro at that by now. Still, it may be worth it to get a dev to optimize your best landers further.

Hope that helps! I hope you'll get more tips from the more tech-advanced members!



Amy


01-07-2019 07:43 AM #7 andy_d (Veteran Member)

Pretty solid set up for me has always been:

- MaxCDN for CDN hosted assets (images, scripts mostly)
- Vultr for VPS server (depends on volume, but I usually pick the $40 a month server)
- Cloudflare for DNS hosting
- ServerPilot to configure server and get free SSL (I don't use CloudFlare's anymore, found it to be unreliable).

Pro-Tip: Enabling PageSpeed on server (make sure it doesn't break your pages).
Pro-Tip 2: Use Kraken.io to compress image assets
Pro-Tip 3: Place CSS on page to avoid less HTTP requests
Pro-Tip 4: Use gt-metrix to measure response times and optimize according to recommendations
Pro-Tip 5: For popular libraries like jQuery, use google's CDN copy


01-07-2019 08:39 AM #8 manu_adefy (Veteran Member)

Quote Originally Posted by andy_d View Post
Pro-Tip 2: Use Kraken.io to compress image assets
https://compress-or-die.com/ - Beats Kraken by far from my experience, also more flexible to balance quality/compression.


01-08-2019 10:04 AM #9 andy_d (Veteran Member)

Quote Originally Posted by manu_adefy View Post
https://compress-or-die.com/ - Beats Kraken by far from my experience, also more flexible to balance quality/compression.
I checked it out. Tested 1 file and it was definitely smaller, marginally, but still smaller.

The problem with that site is that you can only do 1 file at a time it seems, not as user friendly as kraken.

Although you could always code something up: https://compress-or-die.com/developers/

Will look into this


Home > Technical & Creative Skills > Programming, Servers & Scripts