Home > Hosting, Servers & Security >

Benchmarking Tracking202 Hosting (27)

03-19-2012 04:25 PM #1 tijn (Moderator)
Benchmarking Tracking202 Hosting

Im trying out some new hosting for my 202 setup and I've just stress tested it with Blitz.io.

I managed to rush 1-250 visitors in 60 seconds without any timeouts and 120ms load times.

The key is....

this was FREE hosting!





Setup:

* Prosper 1.7.2
* Cloud server
* 200MB Ram
* Mysql with 10MB Ram
* Memcached with 10mb ram
* Simple Landingpage with the T202 JS Embed code, no redirect

Here is the page I loaded:

HTML Code:
<html>
<head>
	<title>Testing 1</title>
</head>
<body>
	<h1>Test 1</h1>
	<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
		cbr202=Math.random()*10000000000000000;
		document.write('<scr'+'ipt language="JavaScript" src="https://my-tracking-202-domain/tracking202/static/landing.php?lpip=217&202cb='+cbr202+'" type="text/javascript"></scr' + 'ipt>');
	</script>
</body>
</html>
Now im sure you all want to know where I hosted this.

You'll have to wait!

Im testing a number of providers and once I have a conclusion Ill share the result with you.

But please share your own benchmarks.

03-19-2012 04:28 PM #2 tijn (Moderator)

Actually I just realised!

Blitz.io does not interpret the Javascript and therefore its not a fair reflection on the performance of this server. Ill change it to redirect and repost the stats.

03-19-2012 04:28 PM #3 rafael (Member)

I'm definitely interested in this , I am looking for a VPS right now. How much do we have to wait??? hehe

03-19-2012 04:29 PM #4 hmate9 (Member)

Google is 112MS. That is a pretty good free hosting service!

03-19-2012 04:38 PM #5 hmate9 (Member)

Time to move STM servers to free hosting:

03-19-2012 06:00 PM #6 hd2010 (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by hmate9 View Post
Time to move STM servers to free hosting:

^^ bad idea

03-19-2012 08:00 PM #7 miki (Member)

Here are my results from yesterday test:



I hit up to 25 visitors to landing page that has prosper javascript inside it.
But this was real landing page with several variations (lp genius).
400 to 600ms load time...

This is new server and I'm starting optimizing it now.
Will posts more results after optimization is done.

03-19-2012 09:21 PM #8 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

Some stuff were working on.. :-)

This includes a browser header redirect, stat processing a browser data dump.

03-19-2012 09:27 PM #9 tijn (Moderator)

miki -> what did you use to do the testing? loadimpact?

03-19-2012 09:41 PM #10 miki (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by tijn View Post
miki -> what did you use to do the testing? loadimpact?
Yes, loadimpact.
Is there something cheaper or better ?

03-19-2012 10:42 PM #11 tijn (Moderator)

load impact looks pretty solid

03-20-2012 08:04 AM #12 miki (Member)

Tyler, is this some tool performed locally (in the same network) ? (the network latency was not accounted for)

03-20-2012 11:09 AM #13 tijn (Moderator)

Hey miki

The stats Tyler shared are from Blitz.io and are therefore including network latency as they are external to Tyler's datacenter

Its exciting stuff!!

03-20-2012 02:58 PM #14 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by miki View Post
Tyler, is this some tool performed locally (in the same network) ? (the network latency was not accounted for)
The benchmark includes all network latency. Same facility as stmforum.com is hosted from.

03-20-2012 03:06 PM #15 miki (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by BeyondHosting-Tyler View Post
The benchmark includes all network latency. Same facility as stmforum.com is hosted from.
So, what is cost of that server ?
One I posted here is $70/mo

03-20-2012 06:20 PM #16 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by miki View Post
So, what is cost of that server ?
One I posted here is $70/mo
It's not available to you. Sorry.

03-20-2012 06:20 PM #17 kokofai ()

My Setup:



Images are hosted on MaxCDN.

Result from Loadimpact:



The landing page is about 150kb in size. Consists of 85% image and 15% document.



You can't go wrong with BeyondHosting

03-20-2012 06:52 PM #18 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

03-20-2012 09:16 PM #19 Mr Baffoe (Veteran Member)

Whatever performance you are getting now will just get waaaay better with new P202. Optimizing everything (again) for speed, high number of concurrent hits, and more.

03-20-2012 11:29 PM #20 leber026 (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by BeyondHosting-Tyler View Post
It's not available to you. Sorry.
I'm not sure I get this, you are running a hosting company pimping a server that your not offering? Doesn't add up.

03-21-2012 03:04 AM #21 colin (Member)

It is great to see some benchmarks from different hosts. Here's mine from a 1Gb VPS on WiredTree. I crashed it a couple times with PPV a while back and upgraded to LiteSpeed + MemCache, but still haven't been happy at high volume. Lander is just an image hosted on CDN and the P202 tracking script. Lots of timeouts after 150 users per second -- not good.



03-21-2012 05:11 AM #22 extremesg (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by leber026 View Post
I'm not sure I get this, you are running a hosting company pimping a server that your not offering? Doesn't add up.
He was just showing off!

03-21-2012 09:12 AM #23 miki (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by extremesg View Post
He was just showing off!
Yes, we can ping google and just show screenshots here

03-21-2012 09:15 AM #24 kokofai ()

Quote Originally Posted by Mr Baffoe
Whatever performance you are getting now will just get waaaay better with new P202. Optimizing everything (again) for speed, high number of concurrent hits, and more.
When will it be released?

03-21-2012 11:18 PM #25 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by leber026 View Post
I'm not sure I get this, you are running a hosting company pimping a server that your not offering? Doesn't add up.
Because its not prosper? The slow part of this industry is only 40% server, 60% of its software.

03-21-2012 11:18 PM #26 BeyondHosting-Tyler (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by miki View Post
Yes, we can ping google and just sho
LOL Google isn't even as fast ;-)

03-22-2012 05:01 PM #27 leber026 (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by BeyondHosting-Tyler View Post
Because its not prosper? The slow part of this industry is only 40% server, 60% of its software.
I agree the tracking software is slow. But I never said anything about prosper, I don't use it, I asked about the server.

Home > Hosting, Servers & Security >