Anyone else see a increase in Linux traffic from Revcontent lately?
I'm running a campaign and I spent almost $300 on Linux traffic with just 3 clicks to my lander and with RC inability to target much of anything I'm stuck running on it and knowing how small market share Linux has its usually a good sign that its either bot or fraud traffic in most cases.

I've complained to them a number of times about it and I asked for better targeting basic stuff like allowing me to target OS and Browser and they refuse to add it. They just don't seem to care much and seem OK with me pausing even though other OS are working and show signs of life if I could just stop getting Linux traffic.
They just always claim nobody ever requests these targeting features so they don't add them.
You got the remember that trackers are dumb. They only tell you the averaged CPC, and don't tell you which traffic you actually payed for vs bots or spy tools creeping on you.
So just because you're seeing $300 worth of traffic for Linux in your tracker doesn't mean that's what they charged you for it based on the fraud filters they have in place - it could well be $3 or $30 or even $0 if it's just bots they recognized.
The real question is what's the amount spent on non-linux traffic? And do the number of daily visitors match up?
It matches up pretty close my numbers are off usually by about $2 with
Yes, exact same experience. I posted about it in this thread
https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...ince-last-year
We have spent mid to high xxx,xxx yearly on revcontent for a few years and the last 6 months have been nowhere near that run rate. proven campaigns are performing nowhere near what they used to. their old CEO left the company in december so i sense there are some problems internally.
Perhaps buying traffic through
The question is if you’ll get traffic from the same proven widgets you receive when you’re buying direct. But it’s worth a try.
Sent from my iPhone using STM Forums