Zeropark Push Traffic RIDICULOUS Rule (6)
So I've been running push campaigns on zeropark for a while now, and one of my campaigns got rejected for this reason as stated by the support:
I understand if I get rejected for too aggressive landers or too much nudity, but this rule is 110% ridiculous.
How tf am I supposed to test offers and landers? One might say find the best offer+lander on pop first and move to push but it's not realistic as sometimes a well converting offer on push doesn't even convert 1x on pop for me.
I've also ran something like 20+ campaigns all starting with multiple offers and landers (in some cases 10+ offers in one camp), so I'm wondering why they decided to arbitrarily pull out this rule and enforce it right now.
I've checked their documentation here and it doesn't have this rule: https://zeropark.com/docs/zeropark-f...ns-guidelines/
Only rule that's kind of related is the smartlink one, but I wasn't even running any smartlinks for this campaign!
Just wanted to put this out there to warn people about these weird rules.
I'm 99.99% set on moving away from zeropark once my balance has run out.
Weird rule indeed, it's absolutely common to test several offers, LPs etc in AM, that's how we optimize. I understand they want to be able to fully check the funnels, but this is kinda too much imo. Let's see what the @zeropark guys have to say here, maybe we're missing something.
Hmm, that's weird. Waiting for ZP what they have to say 
Hey all, Thanks for summoning us! 
@s3ks3k
Just to clear stuff up In general we advise against smartlink/rotating campaigns as explained in our guidelines here:
“Smartlink:
We strongly recommend against using rotating offers within one link. Each use of a smartlink in Push Ads will be verified individually. Contact your Account Manager to see if we can approve your smartlink campaign.”
The reason for this is restrictions by our Push sources. Most Push sources are more restrictive than Pop, so we in turn have to be more restrictive and act quickly in order to not be flagged by the source.
In the case with this campaign we found a very aggressive page in the rotation that imitated the Google Safe Browsing page with a countdown clock on it, this was a little to aggressive for us.
If you want to try several landing pages with the same creatives and campaign settings I would suggest using the Copy Campaign tab and making duplicate campaigns for each of the landing pages. This way if one gets rejected by us the other campaigns will stay active.
The alternative is to contact support@zeropark.com and send us the landers you want to run with the campaign.
We know it can be frustrating when trying to find a strong landing page at the same time as dealing with compliance issues, so please get in touch with support we are open for a conversation.
Thanks!
Neill
@zeropark
Thanks for the reply.
The aggressive lander rejected makes sense, but banning rotating offers still doesn't really make sense. Maybe it'd be good to have a field indicating how many offers you are testing in the campaign creation page.
The copy campaign strategy makes sense, but obviously not ideal to get accurate data in the same time period as ideally you want split tests to be running at the time.
Anyways, thanks for the reply again.
@s3ks3k No worries, obviously the last thing we want to do is stop you from advertising, as it would be entirely self defeating 
Like i said get in touch with support and our man Tomek will talk strategies with you, we may even be able to loop in compliance if needed. 
Home > Paid Traffic Sources > Push Traffic