I'm thinking about cloaking native traffic sources like RevContent/MGID/Content.Ad to test out some more aggressive nutra LPs (some of which I've seen from spy tools).
Is the process as easy as using a different residential IP to sign into the traffic source account, using a unique credit card for each account, setting up a normal nutra ad, having the safe page be a compliant nutra LP, and then once it's approved and getting some spend, turning the cloaker on? I'm guessing I should keep the budget relatively low in each account to not raise any flags too.
Is that all there is to cloaking on native? Is the residential IP part necessary? Am I missing a step?
Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks!
You're quite on-point!
That is one way to go, but from the stance of a network that just like to above-mentioned screens campaigns manually, your just risking a ban for your account.
When we find cloakers on our traffic the account is blocked and the advertiser is banned. Not sure if it's something worth risking a perfectly working campaign. In
most cases, if the ad apper on Spy tools it means certain networks allowed them and that ad probably works on their traffic, if your using complexity, you can just
go and check the network that ad was spotted and run it there. Being more aggressive doesn't mean the ad would perform better and in certain cases, it creates
the opposite, especially in Nutra that images can be quite intimidating for a user that isn't prepared for it 
Have you run any native before? You can get away with some aggressive stuff on the networks you listed if you don't target US or certain Tier1 countries, no cloaking necessary.