So I've built quite a few campaigns over the passed month and I'm starting to kind of figure out I'm not sure if my landing pages are aggressive enough.
This is the one that has been converting best for me:

But what I notice is a lot of the landing pages in adplexity, and ESPECIALLY ones I find searching manually (that likely block adplexity) are much more aggressive with things like Google logo, or your computer is infected with a virus (and won't let you exit) type stuff.
Have been able to get profitable campaigns, but not really much more than $10-$15 per day max, and most at just a couple bucks per day.
So just looking for some insight...I mainly use propellerads and they won't allow brand logos...is there traffic sources that do? Or do I have to get into cloaking for that?
Do you think that landing page is just not aggressive enough or should I be able to make that work?
Just want to make sure I'm not spinning my wheels by not being more aggressive with the landing page.
Also one last note is I've pretty much exclusively done iphone\s9 sweeps, haven't really gone into AV or gift cards too much (just a couple campaigns so far).
Would appreciate any type of direction, even if just a little!
It does not look aggressive to me.. pretty normal one.. but ya you are right there are tons of others that use brand logos and names.
Also annoying exit pop.. clickable full screen..etc.
You may try Advertizer.com if u wanna use aggressive stuff..
Sent from my iPhone using STM Forums mobile app
Yeah that one definitely is not too aggressive, even Propellerads approves that one.
What you see on Adplexity is basically what actually is being run. With such an intrusive ad format like pops, you can get better ctr and conversion rate using branded landers, even though unfortunately on some sources such landers are not allowed.
I would say it might be worth a shot trying google/amazon style landers with removed or twisted logos and see what the results are. 
aggressive landers always work better.
this game can be played completely whitehat BUT the more aggressive stuff usually has better CTR's and conversion rates.
Think about the Kardashians promoting a new hair loss offer getting amazing results before and after.
That will always beat a regular joe from the streets.
Thanks guys. I figured the aggressive landers did better - I guess it’s just a game of playing on the edge of the cliff! I’ll try pushing the limits a little further
Sent from my iPhone using STM Forums mobile app
Platinum I was surprised to see you say what you see on adplexity is what is actually being run...I would think the best landers are being hidden from tools like adplexity?
Got it, thanks!
Yes, this LP is aggressive, because you use ISP parameter. So you're saying something from its name. Also there are phrases like "You will receive". It's also thing like "instant winner". Some offers don't allow it.
But to be honest this LP is shitty. I made some A/B tests with it, and ROI is not so good. So there are many much better LPs in Adplexity! I really recommend to test them.
Thanks MrBraun, that's actually very helpful...because I was under the impression this was a pretty good one (it gave me the best results so far) so I just kept running with it (in circles for the most part - with a couple dollar a day campaigns).
At least a good one as in one that PropellerAds would accept...I've been unable to find a better converting one to use on propellerads...
Tried a Google and Amazon lander and they were converting better, but PropellerAds suspended the campaign...back to the drawing board!
Hello Greg,
Do you use maxmind database or something else to show these ISP,Location and IP stuff?
I do not, just what's in my tracker
Coincidentally, I just wrote about aggressive landers in one of the new lessons of the 40-day tutorial:
https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...ying-to-Offers
Hope that helps a bit!
Amy