Usually there are multiple IPs, especially on mobile where the IPs are shared across users.
Some geos also might have limited pool of IPs, but this seems a quite lot.
May I ask what country it is?
This is a desktop campaign in Brazil.
So it is desktop traffic only.
Have you checked out all of the following threads on bot tests?
https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...n-Any-Campaign
https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...n-Bot-Detector
https://stmforum.com/forum/showthrea...s-what-I-found
Hey, eurosen!
We appreciate your attention to your campaigns. If you have any targets you suspect to be of low quality or bot, please send us a report by target. This is one of the cases why tracking is mandatory on our platform, to allow us the opportunity to investigate any claims. We also have a number of our own security checks put in place to identify low quality traffic in which, thereafter are banned from our system and all advertisers are immediately refunded the spend from those sources. It's in our best interest as well as our publishers to single out any suspicious traffic and find the source.
@Rolandb, yes I have been using the Bot trap mentioned by Caurmen in one of the threads. Some IP adresses have a high ctr, some have a ctr of 0.
@Zeropark, I have hundreds of IP adresses which generate multiple visitors even though I have set the the uniqueness to 24 hours.
Slightly confused whether these are bots, what sort of cutoff would be good? 50 visits from a single IP a day is a bot? Or should I go for 100 visits?
Thanks
@eurosen, it's not quite easy to judge upon such matters using only one screenshot from
I have emailed you a few examples.
@Zeropark, thanks for your investigation and refund.
Some of the traffic turned out to be suspicious traffic and they have refunded me for that traffic.
Thanks, @eurosen, for bringing up this thing. It was a cooperation for our mutual benefit!
NIce! Good to hear.
I'm developing an updated bot detection script, for those interested - should be out in a few days.
Thanks, looking forward to it @caurmen!