Home > Native >

Riding Native All The Way To AWC in Berlin! (8)


04-13-2016 02:08 PM #1 noledude (Member)
Riding Native All The Way To AWC in Berlin!

Hey guys,

Decided to start my own follow-along for Native. I'm relatively new to AM, but instead of going into Mobile I've been messing around with Native for the past couple of weeks. I probably should have started my follow-along back then, but better late than never!

Here is a brief summary of where my campaign has been / is now:

I started running a Muscle offer targeting CA on MGID a couple of weeks ago. I must have got lucky, and was profitable day 1. For the next week I was consistently earning 50-60% ROI, cutting a few bad placements here and there. I was spending ~$200/day at this point.

The following week I decided to raise my CPC from $.28 to $.35 to try to scale a bit. This is where everything started going bad. I think the mistake I made was not creating a new campaign in MGID to test the higher CPC. It had no conversions after $200 spend, so I decided to revert to the original bid amount which was working.

Well now after creating a new campaign, and carrying over some of the blacklisted placements, the offer just doesn't seem to be converting. It's getting plenty of clicks. My landers have a CTR ranging from 15-20%.

One of the big differences between this campaign and my original one is the amount of 1-click placements that are popping up. What I mean by this is that I'm hardly able to make cuts on placements because I'm getting sooooo many that just have like 1 or 2 clicks on my ads, and nothing more. So it's rare that one placement receives enough clicks for me to have enough data to cut it.

Profit/Loss so far:
Cost - $2800
Revenue - $2596
Profit : -$204

I'm currently testing a new offer. But getting similar results.

ON TO THE FOLLOW-ALONG:

Goal - Get profitable with Muscle offers on Native. More specifically, get back to at least 50% ROI on this campaign. Make enough profit in this campaign to pay my way to the AWC in Berlin

Traffic Source/Offer
Traffic Source: MGID
Offer: Muscle trial

I believe offers that target male demographics worst best on MGID

-Country/Bid Prices/Budget

Country: Canada
Bid price: $0.28
Budget: $200/day

-Tracking
Adsbridge

What's next:



Thanks for reading!


04-13-2016 03:15 PM #2 thenjp (Member)

Well shit.

Thats awesome.

I know people who have dropped several $$$$ on MGID and have nothing to show for it.

I was in a similar situation to you though. Launched a campaign, hugely profitable—no idea what I was doing or why

There are several things you need to look at before abandoning the old offer.

Here are some ideas to get you on the right track:

1. What metric(s) have dropped—apart from C.R. (Ad CTR, Lander CTR) Is it a specific ad thats dropped?
2. What ads converted before and create hypothesis on why. Then test those with new variations of those ads.
3. Work the landing page. How many different styles are you testing? What are you testing to improve conversions?
4. Are your once profitable placements still getting traffic—if not, why not.
5. Only create a high bid campaign once you have a good amount of data on the placements that are converting. I usually wait till about at least 3 conversions on one placement.

I don't run Muscle but I'm guessing your $200/day budget might not be enough for CA. I usually try 10x the payout daily to get worthwhile data.

The point is, I would really dig into working out why your initial campaign was a success, angles? images? landers? headlines? browsers? time of day? day of the week?

Also, hit up MGID for a rep if you don't have one already.


04-13-2016 03:31 PM #3 noledude (Member)

Hey thanks for the reply, @thenjp

Yeah I've heard a lot of mixed opinions on MGID, so it's definitely a bit surprising but awesome nonetheless.

1. I've noticed one of the ads that was doing REALLY well, just stopped getting shown by MGID. It was responsible for 12 conversions, but now even when I add it to new campaigns, it hardly gets any impressions.
2. See above. But I believe I've tried using variations of that ad and they just got buried. I usually have like 10-12 ads running at once, not sure if that's too much?
3. I was testing 3 different styles, 4 total landers. I honestly didn't do much tweaking cause the CTR was good. But this is definitely something I can work on. I don't have much experience 'tweaking' things for higher conversion rate, so I'm skeptical to screw things up.
4. My profitable placements aren't getting that much traffic and I'm not totally sure why. I've actually been increasing CPC on my solid placements to try to get more traffic from them. Started this last night so will wait to see results.
5. Thanks for the tip, I will wait before increasing the bid (wish I had this advice before haha).

As far as the budget, some days my camp won't even reach it's daily budget of $200. I suspect this has something to do with MGID only showing like 2 of my ads the majority of the time.

I could definitely be better at analyzing data, I'm still getting used to reading data from the tracker and making informed decisions. Hopefully by the end of this campaign I'll have it down.

I'm not really abandoning the old offer, btw. Just testing a new one to see if CVR is better.

Thanks for your help!


04-13-2016 03:52 PM #4 thenjp (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by noledude View Post
Hey thanks for the reply, @thenjp
1. I've noticed one of the ads that was doing REALLY well, just stopped getting shown by MGID. It was responsible for 12 conversions, but now even when I add it to new campaigns, it hardly gets any impressions.
Hit up your rep and try and find out why they're not sending traffic to this ad.

Quote Originally Posted by noledude View Post
2. See above. But I believe I've tried using variations of that ad and they just got buried. I usually have like 10-12 ads running at once, not sure if that's too much?
I dont run on MGID, but I usually stick to 2-3 ads at a time. Especially with a $200 a day budget, thats only around $20 per ad, which isn't significant considering the payout (assuming its above $30 for Muscle)

Quote Originally Posted by noledude View Post
3. I was testing 3 different styles, 4 total landers. I honestly didn't do much tweaking cause the CTR was good. But this is definitely something I can work on. I don't have much experience 'tweaking' things for higher conversion rate, so I'm skeptical to screw things up.
Cool, so you have four, use the peak conversion calculator (there's a thread somewhere here on cutting landers—check it out), and then create variations of the winner. Don't be afraid to screw things up, at least you'll know what doesn't work and don't worry too much about CTR, C.R. is what you want to pay attention to.

Some ideas for improving conversions
- Test different headlines and different images above the fold (try and make both of these consistent with your ad)
- Test different opening paragraphs
- Test different CTAs, if its a link, try a button, if its a button, try a link or a different colour.

For other ideas, take a look at the referring domains where you've got conversions from and look for other affiliate ads (doesn't have to be muscle, could be diet, skin..whatever) and look at what others are doing on their lander. I've gotten a lot of money ideas from just spying other vertical landers.

Quote Originally Posted by noledude View Post
4. My profitable placements aren't getting that much traffic and I'm not totally sure why. I've actually been increasing CPC on my solid placements to try to get more traffic from them. Started this last night so will wait to see results.
Again, hit up your rep and find out why.

Quote Originally Posted by noledude View Post
I'm not really abandoning the old offer, btw. Just testing a new one to see if CVR is better.
From what you've said, it seems the offer isn't the problem. Hit up your AM and see if the old offer conversions have dropped for other affiliates in the same geo.


04-14-2016 01:35 PM #5 noledude (Member)

Update:

From yesterday's campaign:
Spend: $160
Revenue: $76
Conversions: 1 (1 upsell)
ROI: -52%

Notes::

-With the new offer I'm testing, it's looking like 1 of the landing pages is far outperforming the others. It hasn't quite reached statistical significance yet, but it has gotten all of the conversions and the CTR is triple the other ones.

-Campaign still didn't reach it's $200 daily budget. Will have to talk to account rep again about this, but last time he said I should "try adding more ads".

-After realizing the offer wasn't the problem, I'm feeling inclined to switch back to the original offer. Should I stick it out with this new offer? I'm having trouble setting up true offer split testing in my tracker.

-Testing out a new angle targeting dudes over 40, got a lander to go with it.

Quote Originally Posted by thenjp View Post
Hit up your rep and try and find out why they're not sending traffic to this ad.
It's all determined by the CTR of the ad. So I guess the CTR fell and other ads overtook it?

Quote Originally Posted by thenjp View Post
Some ideas for improving conversions
- Test different headlines and different images above the fold (try and make both of these consistent with your ad)
- Test different opening paragraphs
- Test different CTAs, if its a link, try a button, if it's a button, try a link or a different color.
Awesome! I will definitely try this.

According to my account rep, the reason for the profitable placements not getting much traffic could either be:
1. The placement just doesn't have much traffic in the first place
2. Competition on that placement is very high.


04-15-2016 01:25 PM #6 noledude (Member)

Update:

Spend: $108
Revenue: $74
ROI: -31%

Notes:

- Once again the campaign didn't reach its budget. I believe this is because of the ads I cut yesterday. I had way too many that were just eating impressions with super low CTR. I deleted the ones that were hardly being shown by MGID at all and I am in the process of adding some new ones. I'm using variations of successful ads I've had so far.

- I switched back to the original offer after realizing that wasn't the issue. The original offer gets a WAY higher CTR on my landers, a higher CVR, and higher EPC. Coincidentally, minutes after switching back I had a conversion (confirmation bias? haha)

- Hopefully once I get my ads in order again, I can start spending more and analyzing more data on this campaign. I don't think I have enough data to cut any landers yet. The reason for this is because I didn't add all of the landers at the same time, so some of them don't have enough data. Is the idea to choose one winner, then optimize that one even further?

Even though this campaign has been lagging for a bit, I feel fairly confident I can make it profitable again by sticking with it! Thanks for following along


04-17-2016 08:33 PM #7 noledude (Member)

A lot of mixed results this weekend, here we go:

Friday 4/15:
Spend: $160
Revenue: $0
ROI: -100%

Saturday 4/16
Spend: $193
Revenue: $222
ROI: 15%

Notes:
-Ran the peak conversions calculator and cut one of my landers, down to 3 now.

-On Friday, I added a few new ads which ended up performing pretty well as far as CTR goes, which I think explains why my spend finally reached budget (close enough).

-Waking up this morning, I noticed I already had $80 of my budget spent. I checked my tracker and $30 of it was spent on one placement that had a 50% CTR on my landers. I decided to blacklist this placement as I've been told CTRs that high are most likely bots.

-My ads CTR is pretty poor, I think this might be that nature of Native? So running them through the minimum conversion rate calculator doesn't really tell me much. For example, some ads have over a million impressions and only 5 conversions. When I run that through the calculator it looks like this: http://screencloud.net/v/7uIN

-Looking like today is going to be another slow one, $120 spend and no conversions.


04-19-2016 02:17 PM #8 noledude (Member)

So I've noticed that cutting ads that have a low(er) CTR and replacing with better ones on a regular basis gives me better results. I'm talking every day I'll add 3 fresh ads and cut the bottom 3. This could be confirmation bias, but it seems to be having a positive effect. This is what I did late on Friday of last week, and ended up with a positive ROI on Saturday with these ads.

Here are my results from yesterday:

Spend: $196
Revenue: $292
ROI: 48%


Notes:

-As I mentioned, I've been actively refreshing ads. My angles/images are running dry, though, going to need to spend a couple of hours brainstorming/finding new images

-My 3 landing pages all seem to perform pretty equally. I will wait a couple more days before running the peak conversions calculator again

-A lot of the conversions I have come from placements that have only gotten a couple of clicks. Would it be smart to increase my bid on these placements?

-Have had 3 conversions today already, so things are looking up!

Thank for reading!


Home > Native >