Home > Paid Traffic Sources > POP / PPV / Redirect

Basic LP Vs Fancy LP (8)

02-05-2015 08:35 PM #1 aimhigh (Member)
Basic LP Vs Fancy LP

I'm new to the game with PPV and adult, right now I'm just learning and running a few campaigns. What Id love to hear about from you guys is what do you find to be converting the most, flat basic image LP or fancy ones with questions and stuff. I'm reading a lot about angles and creatives on here. So tell me what's your flavour.

02-05-2015 08:41 PM #2 fbqueen (Senior Member)

On PPV I used to "Keep It Stupid Simple" - But I have no experience with adult so I let some adult experts share their current experiences

02-05-2015 08:48 PM #3 aimhigh (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by fbqueen View Post
On PPV I used to "Keep It Stupid Simple" - But I have no experience with adult so I let some adult experts share their current experiences
Thanks, I've yet to test out some basic LPs, been running some that require actions. ��

02-06-2015 01:25 PM #4 bbrock32 (Administrator)

Simple used to convert best for me on PPV.

On adult depends more on the flow banner > lander.

Some survey / progress bar landers have performed way better than the simple ones.

02-06-2015 01:36 PM #5 aimhigh (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by bbrock32 View Post
Simple used to convert best for me on PPV.

On adult depends more on the flow banner > lander.

Some survey / progress bar landers have performed way better than the simple ones.
Thanks because I plan on split testing out both types, btw, can you help me with this please: http://stmforum.com/forum/showthread...l=1#post206092

02-06-2015 01:49 PM #6 kjrocker (Senior Member)

as others said keep it stupid simple , find out problems and offer a solution , People will signup to your offer when they you got a solution to their problems , Just 1.5 cents ..

02-06-2015 04:17 PM #7 caurmen (Administrator)

I think there's a slightly false dichotomy here.

Look at something like the iPad - that's very very simple from the user's point of view, but the technology behind it is anything but. It's fancy as all hell.

Likewise, I think you'll very rarely find a landing page where making it easier to use reduces the CTR, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't use "fancy" technology on the back end.

Quizzes, animations, and so on are all very valuable in making the page apparently less difficult to use or understand from the user's POV.

And then, of course, you get into other things - like using progress bars, as bbrock32 says, which is less about ease of use and more about guiding the user's mindset.

02-07-2015 02:54 PM #8 aimhigh (Member)

Quote Originally Posted by caurmen View Post
I think there's a slightly false dichotomy here.

Look at something like the iPad - that's very very simple from the user's point of view, but the technology behind it is anything but. It's fancy as all hell.

Likewise, I think you'll very rarely find a landing page where making it easier to use reduces the CTR, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't use "fancy" technology on the back end.

Quizzes, animations, and so on are all very valuable in making the page apparently less difficult to use or understand from the user's POV.

And then, of course, you get into other things - like using progress bars, as bbrock32 says, which is less about ease of use and more about guiding the user's mindset.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. ��

Home > Paid Traffic Sources > POP / PPV / Redirect