Hi there,
Volkan here from Istanbul / Turkey. I have joined STM last week and I have been reading anything I can find about mobile. Actually this won't be my first time creating a mobile campaign, I have created 5
mobile campaigns in about 10 months and 1 of them was almost profitable.
I have around 500$ / mo budget. Since it's not much I am going create at least 15 campaigns per month. Any revenue earned from the campaigns will be used for testing/scaling existing campaigns & creating other campaigns so I may create more than 15 if my ROI isn't -100%
(P.S. I count "wifi/app", "wifi/web", "mobile/app", "mobile/web" as 1 campaign and not 4. I can track it with
I have studied computer engineering in university so I have coding skills, I also know how to use PhotoShop, so hopefully I won't have any hard time creating banners and landers, just making them convert 
DAY 1
I am already approved @ PeerFly, NeverBlue, YeahMobi, MobPartner, Matomy and I have just joined F5 Media.
I have accounts on Decisive, mMedia, TapIt, BuzzCity, Mobfox, AdModa & JumpTap. (But really going to use only one for now, jumping around from one traffic source to another never did me any good in the past)
I will be using
Got the top offers sorted by volume / epc from YeahMobi waiting from F5 Media.
MobPartner doesn't have or won't give any info on volume. But at least I got this list of campaigns sorted by EPC : http://www.mobpartner.com/files/publ...gn_Silver.xlsx
I don't know if it means anything without volume, as far as I know someone may have send 10 clicks to a $10 offer and converted 1 which makes it's EPC $1.
DAY 2
Selected an offer from each network, brainstormed angles and created banners for each but created LP only for Offer #1[CPI]. I just want to first test Offer #2[CPS] with DL.
F5 also have Offer #1 with exact same payout as MobPartner, so I applied for it too. Sent my ads & LP to my affiliate managers, waiting approval from the advertisers.
All the best mate
All the best and i'll follow your journey 
Nice man, love the attitude!
Since you're creating so many campaigns try to focus on keeping a good flow, you don't want to become lost in it all and for frustration to creep in, but nonetheless get at it man I'm watching this thread
!
stacking your money!
Thanks alot for your good wishes guys.
So I have got one question, publisher X has 60 clicks and no conversions. The average payout of the offer over 3 networks is around $0.35, and the cost of that publisher to me is 60 * $0.05 = $3, it's more than 8 times the offer payout.
I am tempted to kill it, BUT the clicks are spread like this:
Carrier 1 : 33 ($1.65)
Carrier 2 : 6 ($0.3)
Carrier 3 : 3 ($0.15)
WIFI : 23 ($1.15)
Is it safe to assume that publisher X is no good. (My other campaigns which is profitable has 1 publisher with almost 10% CR on Carrier 2, and zero conversions on Carrier 1)
Should I block the publisher only on Carrier 1? (Which will require me to create 3 seperate campaigns on the traffic source for each carrier)
DAY 3
Stats:
Expense : $50.53
Revenue : $0.64
Profit : - $49.89
ROI : - 98.7%
(The other campaign that I resurrected is profitable like $5/day. But I will not add it's stats or mention it from now on in my updates since it was a campaing created long before this follow along.)
I spent too much! You can read the reason for that in my previous post. In summary, I tried to give each placement enough clicks from different carriers but while waiting clicks from Carriers 2 & 3, Carrier 1 kept eating my budget. That's why I am changing the way I create campaigns on the traffic source, from now on it will be like:
Offer Name - Country - iOS - Wifi
Offer Name - Country - Android - Wifi
Offer Name - Country - iOS - Carrier 1
Offer Name - Country - Android - Carrier 1
Offer Name - Country - iOS - Carrier 2
Offer Name - Country - Android - Carrier 2
Each campaign will have a budget set depending on the payout, and will be stopped if it's not at least -50% ROI after the initial budget is spent. Also each placement in each campaign will be cut after spending 1x - 2x the payout without any conversions.
Other than that I am having difficulties choosing offers, most of the offers in the top offers list I got from F5 Media are sweepstakes and I am completely useless when it comes angle creation for sweepstakes.
DAY 4 & 5
Stats:
Expense : $56.1
Revenue : $0.96
Profit : -$55.14
ROI : -98.2%
It's taking too much time and money for me to test a campaign, I have to simplify how I do it. I also think I am over analyzing, even if it has only converted 9 times after 1400 clicks (cpc $0.05 - payout $0.3) I still try to block the publisher that has spent too much and give other publisher a chance to convert. I don't know why I do that it's stupid...
While I was promoting PPV offers I would DL and rotate 3-5 different offers from the same vertical and throw $15 worth of traffic to each offer and then only work on the offers that has generated conversions. I wonder if I can try it with mobile offers. At the moment I come up with angles, create banners and LPs, get them translated, create campaigns on
1400 clicks to the offer?
If that's the case then it's your angle, the traffic, or the offer that aren't performing.
There's no point in sending more and more money through the funnel when it's simply not converting.
Going broad and rotating multiple offers is a good approach provided you are comfortable with drilling down into the data to figure out where your highest earnings are coming from.
What kind of offer is it?
Some offers and approaches need a lander more than others - so much so that starting direct-linked can be a waste of time.
Additionally, landing page CTR can give you a preliminary metric on how well your angle is engaging your audience.
Game installs generally don't need landers but some app installs will do better with them.
For simple game/app installs I would focus on direct linking and playing with angles to get traction. Traffic source matters a lot here, so either test a few or - if Decisive, try raising the CPM drastically to access higher quality placements.
I would advise Never try Web adnetworks for Appinstalls.
Try Mobile SSP networks (The ones that provide developers with SDK's).

Hmm, just looking at these stats - have you done any testing to see if you're getting a lot of bot traffic?
http://stmforum.com/forum/showthread...367#post180367 is the method I developed a while back - seems to work pretty well to detect dumb bots at least.
Day 6 - 10
Stats:
Expense : $116.2
Revenue : $33.45
Profit : -$82.75
ROI : -71.2%
Generally, yes. It depends on just how wide a net you're casting, but IMO it's usually worth doing.
Update:
So I have been creating campaigns and failing miserably. Below are some of the campaigns I have tried over the last 2 weeks. I have uploaded some banners & LPs to imgur so maybe you can tell me how they are.
I don't know what I am doing wrong but all of my campaigns end up doing -100% ROI or -90% at best. So I have got some questions for the more experienced marketers, I would be grateful if you can shed some light on them.
It can be really frustrating when you're trying everything you can think of and just can't get your campaigns off the ground - much sympathy.
First question I would ask here, before I get to your questions: is there anything you always do the same? Same approach to banner design, same image source, same couple of networks? Same amount of testing before cutting placements? Anything that's a hidden part of your process that never changes?
And first tip: you're not doing badly at all here. If you've been launching 15 campaigns a month and you're two weeks into that, that's only about 8-10 campaigns. It could well be that you just haven't found the right offer / traffic source combination yet - there's a LOT of fishing to do before you find a winner. Have a look at Stackman's post from last year about how he hit mobile marketing after BKK - he tested more than 30 offers to find one huge winner.
1) Imagination can be trained. It doesn't look like you're doing terribly badly with your angles. I would, however, suggest getting off the beaten track a bit with your offers - don't just test AM-recommended ones, test ones that look good for any reason, or that you hear about on the forums. Test widely - it's OK to test a few lemons to find a gem. Also, I notice you're not testing PIN submits - you could definitely give those a go too.
How many networks are you with?
2) None of those angles look appalling on first glance - I think you're just going through the testing process. Maybe try and do a bit more research on your target geos to find topical or off-the-beaten-track ideas for angles.
3) Again, nothing looks terrible here. You could probably try varying the designs a bit more - there are a lot of banners with quite similar designs - but you're definitely on the right track. Have you tested your landers to make sure that they're actually rendering properly on the most popular phones in the geos you're targeting? Also, are you testing direct link too?
4) As MrGreen has proved recently, Decisive still has solid traffic, although it's likely to be a bit pricier in some of the top geos. Testing more traffic sources is a decent idea, but you might just want to stick to one for now - it's very unlikely that sticking with Decisive will be the sole reason you keep seeing -90% campaigns.
5) If an angle's not working overall, it's not worth exhaustively testing every combination of banners and LP with it. I'd recommend killing angles that aren't working fairly rapidly - more like after $120 spend than £250, and even lower than that for small payout offers. For the Dolphin example, I'd probably be killing sub-campaigns after one round of optimisation and placement removal if there were no obvious red flags (like one placement eating all the spend). You can probably stick with 2 angles per offer rather than 3 initially, too, to keep the spend down.
6) That sounds about right to me. From looking at your landers and banners, it doesn't look like you're rushing too much. Volume of output is important.
7) I wouldn't recommend that unless you have a large budget to play with. Find a traffic source that you know is profitable for other people, and focus on getting to profit on there. Adding in "test all of the traffic sources!" to your to-do list will make the problem space unacceptably large.
8) Yes, that's the correct approach. However, I strongly recommend doing a test for bot traffic too - a placement that's converting minimally might be converting that way because you haven't cracked the best banner combo for it yet, or it might be converting like that because 95% of its traffic is bots!
9) Taking this approach wouldn't be the worst idea in the world. It sounds like you're over- rather than under-thinking things: taking a ruthless "get through as many campaigns as possible" approach is a pretty solid way to success. Do watch out for confounding factors like single placements eating all your spend, but other than that, a "did it work? If not, dump it and move on" approach will probably work well.
As to what to do next: I'd recommend testing 2-3 angles per offer/geo combination. If the offer's not working in a geo after 3 angle tests, try a new offer.
Hope that helps! Looking forward to hearing how you get on next!
If you'd like more feedback, post details on some of your more successful campaigns and we'll all see what we can glean!
Thanks a lot caurmen, I really appreciate your time and help.
